false start? Well, for a couple of reasons. First of all, a negative result, 5-2 for the hosts of Da Vinci Café. The final match report was perhaps a bit too strict with the boys Baraonda, but nothing changes: the that counts is goals scored, and from this point of view, the team had not received Battilega good that has sown. Second, highly dependent on the first, to score points against a "big" in the first day of the championship, it was important for morale and for the classification and the objective to achieve salvation. But first things first.
brief summary of the match (just right for the blog Mirko Melandri).
E 'Da Vinci to start the game in the best way. Marks and Associates, spin the ball well and become dangerous with shots from long range. Not surprisingly, the goals of the benefit comes from a left-captain of the white striking Mazzanti and displaces insesorabilmente Cavallo. However, the advantage shakes guests react, starting with a good circulation of the ball and look out over the parts of the door. Of note some dangerous free-kick, especially one of Mazzanti you were to turn into assists for Impagnatiello but fails to stow under an unfavorable contrast with an opposing defender. The fact is that to take advantage is still the Da Vinci bagging the second goal before the end of time. In the second half the Orange play a lot better, even if it is well contained by opponents that offer little room for advanced rivals. In one of the few offensive, three against two, the Baraonda shorter distances, with a shot that beats beneath Paque Brands output low. Here, guests are charged inexperience, going to tip the balance forward and laying down the suffering un'infilata 3-1. After a failed opportunity, especially with Cornazzani but well fiugra debut ever, is still Impagnatiello to go online by the exchange with his new signing orange. Marks denies breakeven in a couple of occasions in Sarti: is exceeded, when the pole deflects a ball low to the ground for all'angolino. And of course, on yet another reversal in the face, comes the goal of 4-2. In the end, still marks neutralizes a free throw to Sarti, and the Da Vinci closing the accounts with a goal at the last moment, the result of a feat of their striker.
Referee .
Bravo, little to say. In my opinion, has blown the whistle almost always correctly. Only note, and here I turn mostly AICS to help grow the referees, a little less tax on certain things. I (Sarti) have been admonished for saying "fuck" during the game. Now, since Madonna flew (I did not bother, but the regulation is) for the whole game, I was warned if I'm right at least to be warned (because the rules talk about red) those committing this "sin" (battutone !!!). I want to clarify that the "cock" was linked to a moment of play was the third foul that I suffered the first to introduce me face to face with the goalkeeper. Light tactical foul, which I notice should be punished with a yellow card. Especially considering the way in which I myself have done in the notebook of the Director. So, in my opinion (and I repeat, do not say it presumptuously, but to help you grow throughout the Aics Imola level) is right to warn imprecations (if they're from both sides), but it would be more fair Use the cards for foul play involved in it, but a dangerous stop. That said, I repeat, however good the way he "managed" the faults of the two formations.
personal opinion.
We did not play too bad. Indeed, for most of the game we embarrassed the champions of the regular season last season. Let us remember that just last year, direct comparison was lost 12-1.
To note a good circulation of the ball, but has not ever worn a numerical superiority. Were to be awarded the few overlap made to make our operation more dangerous. It 'clear that the Baraonda miss a player can go into the goal with ease. Only with more precise choral activities can reach that network in more than we need. Then, if there's also personal actions, the better. On defense, instead, we paid (always my personal opinion) the inexperience. When we lost the man (2 times in the second half) their I have been scoring advantage, among others, with Enzo. As for the other marking opponents, maybe we left too much room for the shot: I do not say that we made outrageous mistakes, for example the first goal was deflected unfortunately. But only if we are a little closer to humans is more likely that the ball hits us in full. The last goal, there is. It is true Dini was left stunned, but not a heavy responsibility in view of its excellent performance (better with Paque no doubt) and since it was the last action of the match ended up scoring well. Conclusion: good performance. Ok, we expected more from individuals, maybe by myself, but I think the important thing was to gamble for most of the match against an opponent in the final title contenders. Let us never forget that in the field there are also others. E 'right, absolutely right to thoroughly analyze our faults, but let's also some merit to that Da Vinci was able to suffer (especially because in the second half, the ball of the game was in our hands: then we have failed to transform our demerits in possession of dangerous occasions this is another account, which of course we can and must improve) and hit at the right time. So guys false start. Next Friday we can already make up for the DLF against, once again at home the Tozzoni. Come on guys, come on HSL.
0 comments:
Post a Comment